Recreation Conflict - Norms This article examines the theory that predicts that when encounters exceed
a visitor's norm for seeing others, crowding will increase. Data from 13
different studies, which included both high- and low-density study sites, 12
different activity types and a total sample size of 10,697, is used in this
study. Recreation encounters were measured by asking respondents to indicate
the number of people they remembered seeing and crowding was measured using a
a 9-point Likert scale. Individual encounter norms were determined by asking
respondents to specify the highest number of encounters they would tolerate
for a given situation. The study found that crowding was significantly higher
for individuals who indicated more encounters than their norm. However,
respondents only felt "Slightly" to "Moderately" crowded indicate medium
strength relationship. This relationship was found for three different
predictor variables: backcountry versus frontcountry; type of activity (e.g.
canoers, hikers, hungers, anglers); and whether there conflict or no conflict.
These findings highlight the importance of measuring all three concepts -
encounters, perceived crowding and norms - to develop an understanding of how
the existing conditions compare to the standards for the experience to be
offered. Donnelly, M., J. Vaske, D. Whittaker and B. Shelby. 2000. "Toward an
understanding of norm prevalence: A comparative analysis of 20 years of
research." Environmental Management 25(4): 403-414. This paper examines the results of 30 studies on recreation encounter norms
and their prevalence. Norms define what behavior should be, rather than what
the behavior actually is. Encounter norms refer to people's expectations in
terms of the number of encounters with other recreationist they would tolerate
before their recreation experience would change. In some cases, when an
individual's norms are not met, conflict may occur. Norm prevalence refers to
the proportion of people in a population who can articulate a norm in a
specific context. This paper empirically examines the prevalence of encounter
norms in 56 evaluation contexts. Four predictor variables were examined. (1)
type of resource, (2) type of activity, (3) type of encounter, and (4)
question response format. Many of the results confirmed existing hypotheses:
norm prevalence varied by whether the activity occurred in the backcounty or
frountcountry with backcountry users more likely to have a norm; in situations
where conflict exists norms are more likely to occur; and studies that used a
two-category response option (number and "makes no difference to me") had more
norms reported than studies that uses a three-category response format (also
included "makes a difference but I can't give a number). The three positive
independent variables explained 64% of the variance in norm prevalence. In
contrast, the type of activity (consumptive versus non-consumptive) had no
influence on norm prevalence, but it may be that specific types of activities
or level of specialization are more meaningful categories. Manning, R. E. 1999. "Indicators and standards of quality: A normative
approach." In Studies in Outdoor Recreation: Search and Research for
Satisfaction, Second Edition, 122-155. Corvallis: Oregon State University
Press. This chapter reviews indicators and standards of quality with a particular
emphasis on personal norms. Personal norms are standards that individuals use
to evaluate recreation conditions. The level of acceptable interaction with
other recreationists in an example of recreation-orientated norm. Personal
norms can be aggregated to develop social norms and help set management
indicators or standards of quality. While there are many issues associated
with norms research and their application to recreation management, research
as generally supported the notion that norms can use to set valid management
standards. Norms are reported more often, are more highly crystallized and
tend to less tolerant in wilderness and backcountry areas than in frontcountry
or more highly used areas. Normative standards of quality of visitors may vary
from those of managers. There is often a hierarchy of importance among
indicators of quality. Hall, T. and B. Shelby. 1996. "Who cares about encounters? Differences
between those with and without norms." Leisure Sciences 18(1): 7-22. The normative approach can be used to set management objectives for
acceptable standards for recreation. The goal is to provide visitors with the
desired experience and, as a result, minimize potential conflicts. In theory
norms can be used to set the management standards when there is substantial
agreement among recreationists. Some research, however, has found that this
may not be possible. This study uses a sample of hikers and stock users from
the Eagle Cap Wilderness in Oregon to investigate the relationships between
variables including mode of travel, destination (high or low-use), past
wilderness experience, attitudes toward impacts, attitudes toward management
practices, and the presence of individual norms for encounters. Approximately
44% of respondents reported a norm for encounters with others, 29% said
encounters matter but could not give a number, and 28% said that encounters do
not matter to them. Residence, trailhead use level, and past wilderness
experience were related to the presence of norms. Those with norms were move
likely to rate social and ecological impacts as problems and were more
supportive of restrictive management practices. Lewis, M., D. Lime and D. Anderson. 1996. "Paddle canoeists' encounter norms
in Minnesota's boundary waters canoe area wilderness." Leisure Sciences
18(2): 143-160. Debate exists about whether encounter norms are measurable and whether the
measured encounter norms accurately represent visitors' preferences about
acceptable use levels. This study collects "trip diaries" from paddle
canoeists in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness to collect data on
their actual encounters and preferences for acceptable use levels that would
not spoil their sense of being in the wilderness. Findings suggest personal
and social encounter norms can be defined by most paddle canoeists that
accurately express desired encounters with other parties. However, variability
among social encounter norms was discovered. Despite this, the authors suggest
that managers should consider encounter norms as a key source of information
for future management decisions. Encounter norms offer an important method for
setting management standards that are likely to mitigate visitor conflict and
ensure maximum visitor satisfaction. However, given the lack of norm consensus
in this study, future normative research should focus on developing a better
understanding of normative consensus issues. Although much research has
examined normative consensus, few findings specify what constitutes sufficient
agreement among encounter norms. Manning, R., D. Johnson and M. VandeKamp. 1996. "Norm congruence among tour
boat passengers to Glacier Bay National Park." Leisure Sciences 18(2):
125-141. Using visitor norms, both personal and social, are increasingly being used
to set standards of management goals and standards of quality in recreation.
Setting appropriate management goals is key strategy for managing conflict in
recreation. An important research question, however, is whether visitors'
evaluations and behavior are congruent with norm-based standards. This study
tests norm congruence among tour boar passengers to Glacier Bay National Park.
A sample of tour boat passengers was surveyed to determine (a) personal norms
for the number of watercraft and aircraft seen, (b) number of watercraft and
aircraft seen, and (c) the effect of watercraft and aircraft seen on
enjoyment. The results of this study are somewhat mixed. When viewing a the
sample as a whole, the findings indicate a relatively high level of norm
congruence. However, a subpopulation of respondents that constitutes a
stricter test of norm congruence suggests a substantially higher level of norm
incongruence. The paper explores a number of reasons that might help explain
these results including: the need for some latitude around a personal norm;
the small number of watercraft/aircraft dealt with in this study; the study
actually found little "extreme" incongruence which may be a better measure;
that a visitor evaluation of an encounter may depend on the behavior of the
watercraft/aircraft; the global measure of enjoyment was used to measure norm
congruence which may be inappropriate; normative standards may be more fully
developed by recreation specialists; and the possibility that the norms being
measured in this study were not important to visitors (norm salience) which
may lead to challenges in visitors establishing a norm. Shelby, B., J. Vaske and M. Donnelly. 1996. "Norms, standards, and natural
resources." Leisure Sciences 18(2): 103-123. The article reviews the "normative approach" to recreation management and
recreation management conflict or managing recreation areas based on
individuals' personal norms. The article reviews norms that have been measured
for peoples' acceptance of different characteristics such as number of people
encountered, people engaged in different activities, amount of litter, noise
levels, services provided, instream flow, or ecological impacts. Norms can
vary considerably depending on a number of factors including activity types,
activity setting or motivation for engaging in the activity. Norms are
increasingly being used in resource management to help set management
direction, to define the salient characteristics of high quality settings, to
define standards that can be used as management targets, to differentiate
minimal conditions from optimal conditions, to identify important impacts
about which people feel more strongly, and to indicate the degree of consensus
among various interest groups. The article also reviews some of the important
considerations in norms research. Finally, the authors conclude that the
normative approach is an interesting study of the symbiosis between science
and management and, in particular, with science providing valuable information
to managers making decisions on how things "should be" in recreation areas. Ruddell, E. J. and J. H. Gramann. 1994. "Goal orientation, norms, and
noise-induced conflict among recreation areas users." Leisure Sciences
16(2): 93-104. This study evaluates the goal interference theory of recreation conflict
using data from a survey of 338 winter visitors to Padre Island National
Seashore, Texas. The goal interference model defines interpersonal conflict as
behavior of others that interferes with personal recreational goals. The model
also proposes that variations in personal standards of appropriate behavior
for a setting were a major source of such interference. The theory, however,
did not address that possibility that some goals may be more vulnerable to
interference from physically obtrusive behavior than others. This study finds
that visitors motivated by goals such as being with people considerate and
respectful of others were more likely to perceive interference from loud
radios than were visitors motivated by the goal to be with friends or other
people like themselves. The authors conclude that the more the success of goal
achievement rests on factors beyond the direct control of the actor, the
greater the likelihood of conflict. Visitors whose individual norms for radio
volumes were equal to or less tolerant than the social norm were more likely
to experience interference from radios whose loudness exceeded the social
norm, supporting the role of normative violations in recreation conflict. Heywood, J. L. 1993. "Game-theory: A basis for analyzing emerging norms and
conventions in outdoor recreation." Leisure Sciences 15(1): 37-48. This articles examines games of conflict, cooperation, and coordination for
their relevance to understanding outdoor recreation behavior. Typically, in
conflict games players receive zero-sum payoffs, while cooperation games have
non-zero sum payoffs. Cooperation games are problematic because they have only
one equilibrium solution that players often fail to recognize. Coordination
games, in contrast, present multiple equilibrium solutions. In this article
the "Prisoner's Dilemma" cooperation games is presented as a basis for
understanding how norms can emerge from negotiated solutions to recreation
activity. For example, non-motorized users and motorized users may agree on
how to zone a park for equal benefit. However, when one member of these groups
violates the zoning agreement, all members of the group may be punished for
their actions. While the concepts of cooperative problem-solving provide some
insights into some aspects of recreation behavior and conflict, they are
applicable only to a narrow range of recreation management problems involving
aspects of activity appropriateness or providing opportunities for engaging in
an activity. Coordination games illustrate a wider range of recreation
management problems where multiple equilibrium exist. As long as an
equilibrium is found then conflict between user groups is avoided. Examples
include who yields to who on right of ways (as long as one group yields to the
other) or trash disposal in backcountry-wilderness areas (as a long as a
strategy is agreed upon - carry-out or burning and buried). Coordination games
can be solved through oral communication or, more likely, through the
establishment of a system of suitably concordant mutual expectations. The way
that people understand and solve coordination games forms a basis for
understanding how behavior conventions emerge, are maintained and lead to
individual norms. Shelby, B. and J. J. Vaske. 1991. "Using normative data to develop evaluative
standards for resource-management - A comment on 3 recent papers." Journal of
Leisure Research 23(2): 173-187. Social norms are increasingly being used to set recreation management goals
and objectives, and is one tool for management recreation conflict. Social
norms are measured empirically by aggregating norms measured at the personal
level. This paper reviews three studies that examine issues related to the
measurement and definition of management norms and comments on the issues they
raise. Two of the studies find that norms are not a useful criterion for
managing overall satisfaction of the visitor experience, but that norms are
likely quite useful for setting management standards. The third study
highlights a number of issues with norms including the fact that they are
likely to exist more in low-encounter activities and the challenge of
identifying a consensus or acceptable level of norm agreement for them to be
used as management standards. Using norms as evaluative management standards
is a relatively new approach, and this paper's author highlights the
importance of not confusing the process of resolving theoretical and
methodological issues with the application of the technique to management. Patterson, M. E. and W. E. Hammitt. 1990. "Backcountry encounter norms,
actual reported encounters, and their relationship to wilderness solitude."
Journal of Leisure Research 22(3): 259-275. This paper investigates backcountry backpackers' norms concerning maximum
acceptable tolerance limits for visual-social contacts at three encounter
sites - trailhead, trail and campsite. Similar to other studies on recreation
norms, this study found that while 83% of the respondents reported
encountering more parties than their acceptable norms, only 34% of the
respondents reported that the number of encounters detracted from their
solitude experience. This common study finding is important for managers
considering how norm-based management might relate to management of conflict
in recreation. This study postulates four reasons for why they may have found
this result in this study: many backcountry users do not have a clear or
salient conception of what a tolerable number of encounters is; visual-social
encounters are of only a minor importance in their whole experience;
limitations in the measurement techniques in the study; and the number of
encounters is important to respondents, but conformity of behavior to
normative beliefs is not a certainty. Whittaker, D. and B. Shelby. 1988. "Types of norms for recreation Impacts -
Extending the social norms concept." Journal of Leisure Research 20(4):
261-273. Social norm theory suggests there may be group agreement about appropriate
conditions for outdoor recreation areas. If managers can identify appropriate
social norms, management standards can be set that assist in satisfying user
expectations and limiting potential conflict. This study investigates various
social norms for boating standards for a variety of social and ecological
impacts on the Deschutes River in Oregon. Survey respondents were asked to
rate a total of eleven impacts and the 460 respondents represented such user
groups as trout fishing, whitewater floating, riverside camping, whitewater
floating, car camping, steelhead fishing and jet boating. Results of the
survey indicated that there were three different social norms types - "no
tolerance", "single tolerance", and "multiple tolerances." For example,
approximately 80% of people reported that it was never appropriate to see
signs of human waste. In terms of on-river encounters, this measure represents
a "single tolerance" norm with people willing to tolerate a certain level of
impact, but few people willing to tolerate uses beyond a certain level.
Finally, peoples' norms for fire rings demonstrated bi-modal distribution with
many users not wanting to see any evidence of fire rings, but with another
sizable percent of users willing to see fire rings at every campsite. Vaske, J. J., A. R. Graefe, B. Shelby and T. A. Heberlein. 1986. "Backcountry
encounter norms - theory, method and empirical-evidence." Journal of Leisure
Research 18(3): 137-153. This article provides a conceptual framework for analyzing the structural
characteristics of norms. In particular the relationship between social norms,
which are standards shared by the members of a social group, and personal
norms, standards held by the individual, does not show perfect symmetry. While
personal norms are usually close to the social norms, they are often quite
close to the social norm, but in some cases may be quite different. The return
potential model is a graphed relationship between a behavioral dimension, such
as number of encounters with other people during a recreation activity, and an
evaluation dimension, using some measure of acceptability, pleasantness or
favorability. In the outdoor recreation, the model for encounters is depicted
as a downward sloping curve from zero encounters being most acceptable to many
encounters being least acceptable. The model is, in essence, an illustration
of the social norm. Two structural properties of the model, norm intensity and
norm crystallization, can be measured empirically. Norm intensity is the
height of the return potential curve both above and below the point of
indifference. Norm crystallization is the amount of agreement about the norm,
or a measure of standard deviation at each point along the curve.
Back to Table of Contents
Vaske, J. and M. Donnelly. 2002. "Generalizing the encounter - norm -
crowding relationship." Leisure Sciences 24(3-4): 255-269.